Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 10;16:4. doi: 10.1186/s12881-015-0148-3

Table 2.

Relative effects of HMIP-2 haplotypes on the ln[HbF%] trait

Compared haplotypes Difference lower upper p adjusted
a-B1 vs. a-b 0.029 −0.35 0.40 1.00
a-B 2 vs. a-b 0.431 0.08 0.78 7 x 10 −3
a-B 3 vs. a-b 0.332 0.01 0.66 0.04
A-b vs. a-b 0.636 0.10 1.18 0.01
A-B vs. a-b 0.638 −0.10 1.38 0.13
a-B1 vs. a-B2 −0.401 −0.10 0.90 0.20
a-B1 vs. a-B3 −0.303 −0.79 0.18 0.47
a-B2 vs. a-B3 0.098 −0.37 0.56 0.99
a-B1 vs. A-b −0.607 −1.25 0.04 0.08
a-B2 vs. A-b −0.205 −0.84 0.43 0.94
a-B3 vs. A-b −0.304 −0.92 0.32 0.73
A-B vs. A-b 0.002 −0.91 0.91 1.00
a-B1 vs. A-B −0.609 −1.43 0.21 0.28
a-B2 vs. A-B −0.208 −1.02 0.60 0.98
a-B3 vs. A-B −0.306 −1.10 0.49 0.88

“Difference” represents the difference in effect size between the two haplotypes on log-transformed HbF levels; negative difference values indicates that the effect size of the second haplotype is bigger than that of the first. ‘lower’ and ‘upper’ represent boundaries for family-wise 95% confidence intervals. ‘p adjusted’ is the P-value adjusted for age, sex as well as multiple testing.

Three haplotypes (shown in bold) have significant HbF-boosting effects at the 0.05 level.