Skip to main content
. 2015 May 6;15:80. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0359-4

Table 2.

Summary statistics detailing node support, age estimation, diversification rates, and niche shifts

Node (mrca) Node support Crown age* Diversification rates* Bioclimatic niche shifts*
(pp|ML) (Ma) shift probability speciation rate pp phenotypic optimum
Hypericaceae 1|100 52.31 0.66 0.00
(62.66–45.00) (0.46–0.88)
Vismieae 1|100 19.59 0.43 1.63
(32.66–10.22) (0.19–0.83) (0.07)
Cratoxyleae .56|60 27.52 0.41 1.11
(41.08–11.23) (0.18–0.81) (0.15)
Hypericum 1|100 25.87 0.75 0.53 −4.24
(33.32–19.59) (0.54–1.0) (0.01)
core Hypericum – Brathys s.l. .83|65 23.67 0.83 0.34 −4.40
(30.41–18.08) (0.59–1.08) (0.01)
Brathys s.l. 1|100 8.77 0.64 1.04 −3.67
(11.82–6.26) (0.54–1.75) (0.06)
core Hypericum + Ascyreia s.l. 1|99 12.46 0.93 1.06 −4.67
(16.44–8.80) (0.75–1.51) (0.03)

*Results produced using age estimation A. For the diversification rate analysis, detected shifts are marked by their probability. The mean speciation rate (species/Ma) per clade is detailed with the 5%, and 95% HPD in brackets below. For the bioclimatic niche analysis, shifts are marked by their probability, and the new phenotypic optimum (PC1 score optimum) is detailed with the standard error in brackets below. HPD, highest posterior density; pp, posterior probability; ML, maximum likelihood bootstrap support; Ma, million years; shift probability, marginal probability of rate shifts.