Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 3;16(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1408-5

Table 4.

Comparison of SWER, MEC and runtimes for SDhaP and CPLEX on simulated diploid data with 1% error rate

Data Simulated data
SDhaP CPLEX(optimal) CPLEX(heuristic)
MEC SWER time MEC SWER time MEC SWER time
l 103, c 10 100 0.001 1 100 0.001 192 100 0.001 57
l 103, c 20 215 0.001 4 215 0.001 1320 215 0.001 373
l 103, c 30 291 0.001 6 291 0.001 1241 291 0.001 910
l 104, c 10 978 0.008 14 - - - 972 0.008 4505
l 104, c 20 2039 0.004 33 - - - 2039 0.004 89811
l 104, c 30 2988 0.004 68 - - - - - -
l 105, c 10 10356 0.008 324 - - - - - -
l 105, c 20 19975 0.007 713 - - - - - -
l 105, c 30 29967 0.005 1810 - - - - - -

MEC, SWER and running times (in seconds) for SDhaP, RefHap, HAPCUT and HapTree algorithms for simulated data of different lengths (l) and with different coverages (c). The data contains a fixed 1% fraction of genotyping errors. SDhaP is more accurate in terms of MEC and SWER and faster by almost an order of magnitude compared to other schemes for longer blocks.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure