Table 8.
SWER, MEC and runtimes of SDhaP for simulated hexaploid data
| Dataset parameters | Genotyping error rate | SDhaP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEC | SWER | t(in secs) | ||
| length 103, cov 30 | 0.0480 | 1270 | 0.1338 | 278 |
| length 103, cov 60 | 0.0283 | 1653 | 0.0215 | 943 |
| length 103, cov 120 | 0.0177 | 2246 | 0.0170 | 1178 |
| length 103, cov 180 | 0.0087 | 1767 | 0.0017 | 8341 |
| length 104, cov 30 | 0.0480 | 14127 | 0.3370 | 1665 |
| length 104, cov 60 | 0.0283 | 16014 | 0.1100 | 5240 |
| length 104, cov 120 | 0.0177 | 21102 | 0.0353 | 19940 |
| length 104, cov 180 | 0.0087 | 72203 | 0.0210 | 30911 |
MEC, SWER and running times of SDhaP for biallelic hexaploid simulated data. HapTree completed the task within 48 hrs in only one case, (l = 30, cov=60), where it achieved MEC=2832, SWER=0.1114, and t = 3441 s, all inferior compared to the results of SDhaP in the table.