Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 23;2015:764163. doi: 10.1155/2015/764163

Table 5.

Summary of pooled ORs in subgroup analyses.

SNP Number of studies Subgroup Genetic model Pooled OR [95% CI] P P hetero
rs2910164 4 Intestinal type GC + CC versus GG 0.95 [0.72–1.25] 0.7 0.04
rs2910165 4 Diffuse type GC + CC versus GG 0.86 [0.74–0.99] 0.04 0.11
rs2910164 3 Intestinal type CC versus GG + GC 0.91 [0.76–1.11] 0.36 0.33
rs2910165 3 Diffuse type CC versus GG + GC 0.88 [0.68–1.14] 0.33 0.26
rs11614913 3 Cardiac lesion CC versus TT + TC 0.91 [0.51–1.64] 0.76 0.04
rs11614913 3 Noncardiac lesion CC versus TT + TC 1.10 [0.63–1.89] 0.74 0.0002
rs11614913 3 Lymph node negative CC versus TT + TC 0.89 [0.74–1.07] 0.22 0.15
rs11614913 3 Lymph node positive CC versus TT + TC 1.54 [0.54–4.35] 0.42 <0.00001
rs11614913 3 Intestinal type TC + CC versus TT 1.27 [1.03–1.55] 0.02 0.23
rs11614913 3 Diffuse type TC + CC versus TT 1.01 [0.78–1.32] 0.92 0.55
rs11614913 4 Intestinal type CC versus TT + TC 0.91 [0.64–1.28] 0.58 0.003
rs11614913 4 Diffuse type CC versus TT + TC 0.83 [0.71–0.97] 0.02 0.4

OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; P hetero, P value for heterogeneity test.