Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jan 2;69(2):150–158. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1456

Table 4.

Neuropsychological Results and Change After 4 Weeks and 24 Weeks of Active Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation

Mean (SD)

Variable Baseline
(n = 17)
4 wk
(n = 16)
24 wk
(n = 17)
Cambridge Gambling Task, normalized score
  Quality of decision makinga 0.9 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) 1.0 (0.1)
  Deliberation time, s 3.0 (2.6) 2.5 (1.2) 2.2 (0.7)
  Risk takingb 0.5 (0.2) 0.5 (0.1) 0.5 (0.1)
  Risk adjustmentc 1.6 (0.8) 1.6 (1.1) 2.1 (1.2)d
  Delay aversione 0.2 (0.2) 0.2 (0.2) 0.2 (0.2)
  Overall proportion betf 0.5 (0.2) 0.5 (0.1) 0.5 (0.1)
Graded naming test, % correct 59.6 (9.5) 66.9 (9.1)g 65.7 (10.8)g
Intra-/Extra-Dimensional Shift
  Total stages completed 8.1 (2.0) 8.8 (0.5) 8.9 (0.5)
  Total errors, adjusted 37.4 (50.9) 17.7 (15.5) 16.1 (14.4)d
Stockings of Cambridge
  Problems solved in minimal moves, No. 8.1 (2.2) 9.4 (2.0)d 9.2 (2.0)d
  5-Move initial thinking, s 15.8 (13.2) 17.1 (16.5) 15.2 (14.5)
  5-Move subsequent thinking, s 2.6 (3.1) 1.3 (1.3) 0.8 (1.1)g
Verbal Recognition Memory, total correct
  Free recall 7.6 (2.4) 7.4 (2.2) 8.5 (2.2)
  Recognition 22.6 (1.2) 22.9 (1.2) 23.2 (1.2)
a

Higher score indicates better decision making.

b

Higher score indicates greater risk taking.

c

Higher score indicates greater adjustment of bet based on risk.

d

P < .05 vs baseline.

e

Higher score indicates greater aversion to delay.

f

Higher score indicates larger average bet.

g

P < .01 vs baseline.