Skip to main content
. 2015 May 7;10(5):e0126373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126373

Table 3. Advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) of random and game trail-based camera trap placement strategies in relation to different types of survey aims, based on a comparison carried out in Ruaha National Park, Tanzania.

Placement strategy Community richness and composition Species presence/Occupancy Space/Habitat use
Pros Cons Pros Cons Pros Cons
Random Detection of species that never use trails Slower to detect many species so greater effort needed to capture full community More likely to detect species that never use trails Less likely to detect larger-bodied and carnivore species More landscape features sampled May need more sampling effort to obtain adequate sample size
Fewer species detected when dense vegetation More accurate characterisation of species preferences across the wider landscape
Game trail-based Detection of most species more rapidly Non-detection of species that never use trails More likely to detect larger-bodied and carnivore species Less likely to detect species that never use trails Larger sample size for many species (particularly larger-bodied and carnivore species) Inferences will be restricted to trails
More likely to detect species when vegetation is dense