Skip to main content
. 2015 May 7;10(5):e0126444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126444

Table 2. Diagnostic value of OPN in individual studies of these 13 eligible publications.

Studies AUCs (95%CI) Thresholds Sensitivity Specificity TP FP FN TN
Kim [22] NR 252 ng/ml Early stage: 0.80 0.80 43 40 8 162
Late stage: 0.85
Mor [23] NR NR 0.80 0.76 80 25 20 81
Nakae [24] NR 489 ng/ml 0.81 0.55 26 43 6 52
Meinhold-Heerlein [25] NR NR 0.88 1.00 59 0 8 67
Moore [26] 0.65(0.57–0.72) NR 0.20 0.90 13 17 54 149
Visintin [27] 0.79(0.72–0.87) NR 0.73 0.70 114 107 42 255
Fredriksson [28] NR NR 0.58 0.85 11 3 8 17
Vrzalova [29] 0.804 2.91 ng/ml 0.47 0.95 9 1 10 19
Lu [30] NR NR 0.17 0.99 26 1 125 152
He [31] 0.68 NR 0.65 0.66 24 5 13 10
Bandiera [32] 0.92(0.87–0.97) NR 0.81 0.81 49 23 11 97
Moszynski [33] 0.83(0.75–0.90) 28.0 ng/ml 0.72 0.89 23 9 9 73
Milivojevic [34] 0.84(0.75–0.93) 650 ng/ml 0.63 0.90 30 3 18 28

NR, not reported;—, no data available; TP, true positive rate; FP, false-positive rate; FN, false-negative rate; TN, true negative rate.