Table 2.

The best-fit points found in global fits in the CMSSM, the NUHM1 and the NUHM2, using the same experimental constraints (and their theoretical interpretations): the difference in the CMSSM best-fit from that found in [19] is due to using the updated ATLAS jets + ${/E}_T$ constraint [10]. We note that the overall likelihood functions in all the models are quite flat, so that the precise locations of the best-fit points are not very significant, and for this reason we do not quote uncertainties. The $p$-values quoted would have the interpretations of probabilities if the likelihood functions given by the ${\mathit{\chi }}^2$ statistics were Gaussian

Model	${\mathit{\chi }}^2$/dof	$p$-value (%)	$m_0$ (GeV)	$m_{1/2}$ (GeV)	$A_0$ (GeV)	$tan\mathit{\beta }$	$m_{H_u}^2$ (GeV${}^2$)	$m_{H_d}^2$ (GeV${}^2$)
CMSSM	35.0/23	5.2	420	970	3000	14	$=m_0^2$	$=m_0^2$
NUHM1	32.7/22	6.6	1380	3420	$-$3140	39	$1.33\times {10}^7$	$=m_{H_u}^2$
NUHM2	32.5/21	5.2	$-$490	1730	4930	21	$-5.28\times {10}^7$	$-4.03\times {10}^7$