Table I. Ratios of features of plant organs affected by PeMYB2, PeMYB11, and PeMYB12 silencing in Phalaenopsis spp. OX Red Shoe ‘OX1408’.
| Treatments/ Replicationsa | Flowers with Color Changed |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sepal |
Petal |
Lip | |||||
| Full Red | Spot | Venation | Full Red | Spot | Venation | ||
| PeMYB2 | |||||||
| Experiment 1 | 25/34b (73.5)c | —d | — | 21/34 (61.8) | — | — | — |
| Experiment 2 | 36/38 (94.7) | — | — | 24/38 (63.2) | — | — | — |
| PeMYB11 | |||||||
| Experiment 1 | — | 33/38 (86.8) | — | — | 0e/38 (0) | — | — |
| Experiment 2 | — | 25/33 (75.8) | — | — | 0/33 (0) | — | — |
| PeMYB12 | |||||||
| Experiment 1 | — | — | 26/41 (63.4) | — | — | 25/41 (61.0) | 31/41 (75.6) |
| Experiment 2 | — | — | 30/39 (76.9) | — | — | 28/39 (71.8) | 30/39 (76.9) |
| PeMYB2+11 | |||||||
| Experiment 1 | 30/33 (90.9) | 30/33 (90.9) | — | 26/33 (78.8) | 0/33 (0) | — | — |
| Experiment 2 | 20/38 (52.6) | 1/38 (2.6) | — | 15/38 (39.5) | 0/38 (0) | — | — |
| PeMYB11+12 | |||||||
| Experiment 1 | — | 1/38 (2.6) | 28/38 (73.7) | — | 0/38 (0) | 30/38 (78.9) | 26/38 (68.4) |
| Experiment 2 | — | 0/32 (0) | 22/32 (68.8) | — | 0/32 (0) | 17/32 (53.1) | 12/32 (37.5) |
| PeMYB2+12 | |||||||
| Experiment 1 | 35/39 (89.7) | — | 30/39 (76.9) | 21/39 (53.8) | — | 25/39 (64.1) | 27/39 (69.2) |
| Experiment 2 | 30/40 (75.0) | — | 35/40 (87.5) | 15/40 (37.5) | — | 29/40 (72.5) | 27/40 (67.5) |
| PeMYB2+11+12 | |||||||
| Experiment 1 | 18/36 (50.0) | 0/36 (0) | 28/36 (77.8) | 15/36 (41.7) | 0/36 (0) | 27/36 (75.0) | 30/36 (83.3) |
| Experiment 2 | 8/35 (22.9) | 0/35 (0) | 25/35 (71.4) | 0/35 (0) | 0/35 (0) | 24/35 (68.6) | 28/35 (80.0) |
a
Replications of experiment per treatment.
b
Number of affected flowers to total number of blossomed flowers in five treated plants.
c
The ratio of affected flowers to total flowers (%).
d
The dashes indicate that the features should not be changed by this treatment.
e
The red spots in petal are not as obvious as in sepal.