Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 29;8:14. doi: 10.1186/s12245-015-0061-8

Table 1.

Summary of survey items (denominator = 629)

SD D N A SA
Overcrowding in the ED makes it an inappropriate location for patients with advanced cancer 10 (1.6) 52 (8.3) 43 (6.8) 250 (39.7) 274 (43.6)
The ED is too noisy to allow adequate care of patients with advanced cancer 7 (1.1) 90 (14.3) 95 (15.1) 252 (40.1) 185 (29.4)
The new 4-h targets will make assessment of patients with advanced cancer easier 116 (18.4) 226 (35.9) 187 (29.7) 85 (13.5) 15 (2.4)
There is enough time in the ED to adequately assess patients with advanced cancer 74 (11.8) 229 (36.4) 137 (21.8) 181 (28.8) 8 (1.3)
There is not enough time in the ED to adequately care for patients with advanced cancer 13 (2.1) 141 (22.4) 83 (13.2) 267 (42.4) 125 (19.9)
The ED lacks the necessary privacy to care appropriately for patients with advanced cancer 6 (1.0) 78 (12.4) 61 (9.7) 271 (43.1) 213 (33.9)
Access block prevents me from providing optimal care to patients with advanced cancer 5 (.8) 49 (7.8) 75 (11.9) 265 (42.1) 235 (37.4)
The dying patient should be allocated a space in ED that is private 17 (2.7) 7 (1.1) 18 (2.9) 153 (24.3) 434 (69.0)
Patients with advanced cancer are reluctant to come to the ED 20 (3.2) 127 (20.2) 267 (42.4) 181 (28.8) 34 (5.4)
The ED is a reasonable fall-back option for patients with advanced cancer 56 (9.1) 203 (33.1) 125 (20.4) 210 (34.3) 19 (3.1)
I feel frustrated that I cannot provide the care to patients with advanced cancer that I would like to provide 4 (0.7) 58 (9.5) 100 (16.3) 286 (46.7) 165 (26.9)

SD, strongly disagree; D, disagree; N, neutral; A, agree; SA, strongly agree. Italics represent largest response.