Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 5;290(19):11802–11817. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.638627

TABLE 1.

Expression and binding of RAG1 core variants

R1 variantsa Protein yieldb RAG2 bindingc
1 384–1008 ++ ++
2 528–777 + −
3 528–1008 ++ −
4 761–980 +++ −
5 761–1008 − NDd
6 Δ721–760 +++ ++
7 Δ464–512 + −
8 499–508Ae − ND
9 477–493Ae − ND
10 Δ512–528 − ND
11 384–555∼983–1008 − ND
12 464–555∼983–1008 − ND
13 384–518∼960–1008 + −
14 383–732∼960–1008 ++ ++
15 384–585∼960–1008 − ND
16 464–732∼960–1008 ++++ ++
17 384–732 + −
18 528–732∼960–1008 +++ −
19 479–732∼960–1008 ++++ ++
20 508–732∼960–1008 +++ +
21 508–732∼960–997 +++ −

a All variants were N-terminal MBP- and C-terminal His6-tagged.

b Protein yield and quality were evaluated by FPLC. ++, expression typical for MBP-R1c; ++++, expression typical for MBP-Mini-RAG1, which is ∼5-fold greater than that of MBP-R1c; +, expression reduced at least 2-fold from MBP-R1c.

c Ability to bind to GST-RAG2 core was tested by BLItz and GST pulldown. ++, binding as seen between R2c and either R1c or Mini-RAG1; +, binding reduced 3–20 fold; −, little or no binding detected.

d ND means not done.

e The indicated residues were substituted by alanine.