Hall et al., 2014 [32] |
USA |
Retrospective quality analysis |
52 patients |
|
Corry et al., 2009 [28] |
Australia |
Prospective study to compare PEG tubes and NGT tubes in terms of nutritional outcomes |
32 PEG and 73 nasogastric tube (NGT) patients |
-
-
PEG patients had significantly less weight loss at 6 weeks post treatment (median 0.8 kg gain versus 3.7 kg loss), but had a higher insertion site infection rate (41%).
-
-
There was 62% tube dislodgement in the NGT group compared with 19% for PEG group
|
Alivizatos et al., 2012 [27] |
Greece |
Retrospective review of medical records |
31 |
Accidental removal of tube (broken tube, plugged tube; 45.1%), tube leakage (6.4%), dermatitis of the stoma (6.4%), diarrhoea (6.4%) |
McNamara et al., 2000 [26] |
Ireland |
Retrospective survey |
50 |
Blocked tube (30%), local infection at stoma site (16%), tube replacement (26%), diarrhoea (34%), vomiting (40%), constipation (48%). |
Crosby and Duerksen, 2005 [25] |
Canada |
Retrospective Survey |
55 out of 221 patients completed the survey |
Granulation tissue formation (67%), broken or leaking tube (56%), leakage around the tube site (60%), stoma infection requiring antibiotics (45%) |
Martins et al., 2012 [30] |
Brazil |
- |
79 patients |
-
-
91.2% presented some complications such as pneumonia, catheter loss, diarrhoea, constipation, fluid leakage, tube obstruction, reflux.
-
-
Pneumonia was the most frequent complication, occurring in 55.9% of cases
|
Ojo, 2011 [1] |
UK |
Retrospective review |
30 patients |
Overgranulation of stoma site (PEG, 26.7%; Balloon gastrostomy tube, 6.7%), infected stoma site (PEG, 6.7%; Balloon gastrostomy tube, 13.3%) during initial visit. |
Erdil et al., 2005 [29] |
Turkey |
- |
85 patients |
More than 30 days after insertion of PEG; Tube occlusion (4.3%), tube displacement (7.6%), wound infection (3.3%), peristomal leakage (2.2%), reflux and vomiting (1.1%), peritonitis (1.1%). |