Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 22;7(4):3022–3037. doi: 10.3390/nu7043022

Table 4.

Stool characteristics in study evaluable (EV) subjects *.

Study Variables Treatment Groups
CF EF1 EF2
Mean Rank Stool Consistency Score ** (Primary Study Variable)
  Days 1–14 2.5 ± 0.1 (51) 2.6 ± 0.1 (57) 2.5 ± 0.1 (57)
  Days 15–35 2.6 ± 0.1 (40) 2.7 ± 0.1 (41) 2.5 ± 0.1 (46)
Stool Frequency, # stools/day
  Days 1–14 2.9 ± 0.3 (48) 3.3 ± 0.3 (55) 3.1 ± 0.3 (56)
  Days 15–35 2.1 ± 0.2 (40) 2.7 ± 0.3 (41) 2.7 ± 0.3 (46)
Percent Watery Stools, %
  Days 1–14 11.3 ± 2.6 (51) 16.3 ± 3.4 (57) 12.7 ± 2.8 (57)
  Days 15–35 8.9 ± 2.0 (40) 11.4 ± 3.4 (41) 13.3 ± 3.4 (46)
Percent Loose/Mushy Stools, %
  Days 1–14 47.7 ± 4.7 (51) 32.9 ± 3.9 (57) 39.5 ± 3.7 (57)
  Days 15–35 40.4 ± 5.5 (40) 31.7 ± 4.5 (41) 41.0 ± 4.7 (46)
Percent Soft Stools, %
  Days 1–14 26.7 ± 3.7 (51) 34.8 ± 3.9 (57) 37.5 ± 4.1 (57)
  Days 15–35 35.3 ± 5.1 (40) 40.1 ± 4.3 (41) 30.3 ± 4.6 (46)
Percent Formed Stools, %
  Days 1–14 10.8 ± 3.0 (51) 10.4 ± 1.9 (57) 9.0 ± 2.3 (57)
  Days 15–35 11.4 ± 2.8 (40) 15.5 ± 2.9 (41) 12.6 ± 2.9 (46)
Percent Hard Stools, %
  Days 1–14 3.5 ± 1.7 (51) 5.6 ± 2.5 (57) 1.3 ± 0.9 (57)
  Days 15–35 4.0 ± 2.2 (40) 1.4 ± 0.6 (41) 2.8 ± 1.4 (46)

Abbreviations: CF = Control formula, EF1 = Experimental formula 1, EF2 = Experimental formula 2; * Values are mean ± SEM (n); ** Mean Rank Stool Consistency Score: 1 = watery, 2 = loose/mushy, 3 = soft, 4 = formed, 5 = hard; Percent of Hard Stools at d1-14; EF1 > EF2 (p = 0.0207).