Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 29;7:93–103. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S76163

Table 2.

Response rates from previous studies using different modalities of treatment for advanced melanoma

Reference Study therapy type Patient no Duration of follow-up (years) Complete response Overall response (CR + PR) Any response (CR + PR + SD) Median overall survival
Chemotherapy
Hill et al1 DTIC 143 5.7 5% 20% 62% 33 m
Robert et al24 DTIC 252 4.5 0.8% 10.3% 30.2% 9.1 m
Chapman et al25 DTIC 220 0.5 0% 5.4% ns ns
Middleton et al26 DTIC 149 1.6 2.7% 12.1% 27.9% 6.4 m
Flaherty et al27 DTIC 108 2.1 0% 8% 39% ns
Middleton et al26 Temozolomide 156 1.6 2.6% 13.5% 31.4% 7.7 m
Bedikian et al28 Docetaxel 40 3 2.5% 12.5% 67.5% 13 m
Avril et al29 Dacarbazine 117 0.9% 6.9% 21.4% 5.6 m
Avril et al29 Fotemustine 112 2.7% 15.2% 32.2% 7.3 m
B-raf inhibitors
Flaherty et al30 B-raf inhib 49
32
0.8 1% (2%)
3.1% (6.25%)
11.2% (22.5%)
40.63% (81.25%)
ns ns
Chapman et al25 B-raf inhib vemurafenib 219 0.5 0.45% (0.9%) 24.2% (48.4%) ns ns
Flaherty et al31 B-raf inhib dabrafenib 54 1 2% (4%) 27% (54%) 47.5% (95%) ns
Immunotherapies
Atkins et al32 IL-2 270 >7 6% 16% ns 12 m
Prieto et al20 IL-2 + CTLA-4 36 7 17% 25% ns ns
Hodi et al33 CTLA-4 137 4.6 1.5% 11% 28.5% 10.1 m
Robert et al24 DTIC + CTLA-4 250 4.5 1.6% 15.2% 33.2% 11.2 m
Coventry et al23 VMCL vaccine 37 6 18.9% 37.8% 83.7% 10 m
Coventry et al17 VMCL vaccine 54 10.1 16.7% 31.5% 77.8% 14 m
Rosenberg et al34 TIL + IL-2 93 6.8 22% 56% ns ns
MEK inhibitors
Flaherty et al27 MEK inhib alone 214 2.1 1% (2%) 11% (22%) 39% (78%) ns
Flaherty et al31 B-raf + MEK inhib overall 162 1 3.1% (6.2%) 29.9% (59.9%) 48.2% (96.3%) ns
Flaherty et al31 B-raf + MEK/1 corrected value 54 1 3% (6%) 25% (50%) 47% (94%) ns
Flaherty et al31 B-raf + MEK/2 corrected value 54 1 4.5% (9%) 38% (76%) 50% (100%) ns
PD-1 inhibitors
Topalian et al35 PD-1 (nivolumab) 94 3 1% 28% 34% ns
Topalian et al36 107 0.9% 31% 38% 16.8 m
Hamid et al37 PD-1 (lambrolizumab) 117 1.33 5.1% 38% ns ns
Wolchok et al38 PD-1 + CTla-4 82 2.5 7.3% 32.9% ns ns
Concurrent therapy 52 9.6% 40.4% 48% ns
Sequential therapy 30 3.3% 20% ns ns
PDL-1
Brahmer et al39 PDL-1 55 2.9 5.8% 17.3% 44.2% ns

Notes:

Approximately 50% of patients show the B-raf V600E mutation in their melanomas, the results for B-raf inhibitory therapy are therefore selected for these patients and represent statistically selected figures. For statistical comparison with unselected patients, these results require correction by dividing the figures by 2 to enable accurate and valid comparisons with other treatments which report results for 100% of melanoma patients. # deaths were in 3 of 296 patients in a trial of mixed tumor types (lung and colon, rather than melanoma). Every effort has been made to accurately represent the reported data, however, there was some inter-study variability in reporting methods between studies, and data was not uniformly reported using standard methods or was missing/unobtainable from some studies thereby inhibiting comparisons between studies. The manner in which the data was presented varied between different study reports.1,2339 Adapted and reproduced with permission from Australian Melanoma Research Foundation data 2014 http://www.melanomaresearch.com.au.

Abbreviations: CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; DTIC, dacarbazine; ns, not specified; B-raf, B-raf mutant pathway inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib; inhib, inhibitor; IL2, interleukin-2; CTLA-4, anti-cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitory antibodies ipilimumab and Yervoy; VMCL, vaccinia melanoma cell lysate vaccine; TIL, autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors; MEK/1, 1 mg dose; MeK/2, 2 mg dose; PD-1, programmed death receptor inhibitors; PDl-1, programmed death-1 receptor ligand inhibitory monoclonal antibody; m, months.