Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 20;16(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1368-9

Table 2.

Efficacy of SNP calling using the consensus sequence or H37Rv as the reference genome by comparing the number of SNPs detected

i) individual strains
Species Strain vs H37Rv vs consensus sequence
M. tuberculosis CCDC5079 632 198*
CCDC5180 378 70*
CDC1551 543 41*
CTRI-2 140 15*
Erdman 570 104*
F11 343 129*
H37Ra 44 38*
H37Rv 12
KZN605 16 9
KZN1435 12 2
KZN4207 26 0
RGTB327 1242 127*
RGTB423 2410 145*
M. bovis BCG Mexico 13 0
Moreau RDJ 136 22*
Pasteur 20 0
Tokyo 172 56 76*
M. africanum GMO41182 876 152*
M. canettii CIPT 140010059 24425* 560
Total SNP found in only one strain 31882 1700
ii) group comparison
four BCG strains 1040 52*
three KZN strains 121 15
All SNP at least found in one strain 37589 3429

Based on SNP calls using MUMmer [58], the number of SNPs called uniquely in individual strains, and in groups of BCG and KZN strains, was determined. *The number of SNPs detected using the H37Rv and consensus sequences as reference were compared for each strain (i) or group of strains (ii) using Fisher's exact test, with significant differences indicated with asterisks (p < 0.0001).