Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2015 Mar 11;69:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.03.003

Table 3.

Main effects and interactions of predictor variables on SUDS and imagery vividness scores.

Fixed Effects Random Effects Model AIC

Effect B SE b 95% CI Slope Intercept
Vividness Ratings .06** 2.98** 1451.63
Session .002 .06 −.12, .12
Gender −.08 .44 −.96, .80
Gender x Session −.21 .09 −.39, −.03*
Paired SUDS scores 19.31** 252.44** 3479.07
Session −8.26 .71 −9.68, −6.85**
Vividness 2.35 .63 1.10, 3.59**
Vividness x Session −.84 .25 −1.33, −.34**

Note.

**

significant at the .01 level;

*

significant at the .05 level.

SUDS = Subjective Units of Distress Scale. SE = standard error. CI = confidence interval. AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion. CIs that do not include zero indicate significant predictors. Vividness ratings are square root transformed and, therefore, produce Bs with signs in the opposite direction from what is indicated. To ease interpretation, signs of Bs and the 95% confidence intervals have been reversed to be more intuitive.