Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2015 Mar 11;69:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.03.003

Table 5.

Main effects and interactions of predictor variables on overall IES-R scores.

Fixed Effects Model AIC

Effect B SE b 95% CI
2820.86
IES Baseline .28 .04 .21, .36
Vividness −.20 .33 −.86, .45
Highest SUDS .11 .02 .06, .16
2820.64
IES Baseline .28 .03 .20, .35
Vividness −.11 .33 −.77, .55
Highest SUDS .10 .02 .06, .15
Vividness x Session −.19 .12 −.44, .06
2814.79
IES Baseline .29 .02 .22, .37
Vividness −1.18 .45 −2.07, −.28
Highest SUDS .10 .02 .05, .15
Gender 1.41 1.30 −1.15, 3.98
Vividness x Gender 1.94 .63 .69, 3.20

Note. SE = standard error. CI = confidence interval. AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion. IES-R = Impact of Event Scale-Revised. CAPS = Clinician Administered PTSD Scale. SUDS = Subjective Units of Distress Scale. CIs that do not include zero indicate significant predictors. Vividness ratings are square root transformed and, therefore, produce Bs with signs in the opposite direction from what is indicated.