Table 2.
Main Linear Mixed-Effects Model Predicting Change in Rating: Fixed Effects
Fixed effect | b | SE | t test | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
First rating | 0.98 | 0.01 | t(665.48) = 179.25 | < .001 |
ΔRating | 0.12 | 0.01 | t(565.93) = 8.53 | < .001 |
ΔRating × Children | 0.21 | 0.02 | t(544.55) = 9.99 | < .001 |
ΔRating × Young Adolescents | 0.15 | 0.02 | t(559.85) = 6.14 | < .001 |
ΔRating × Midadolescents | 0.06 | 0.03 | t(541.26) = 2.28 | .023 |
ΔRating × Adults | −0.05 | 0.02 | t(545.82) = −2.69 | .007 |
ΔRating × Social Influence | 0.02 | 0.01 | t(9619.13) = 2.70 | .007 |
ΔRating × Children × Social Influence | 0.01 | 0.01 | t(9653.10) = 0.71 | .478 |
ΔRating × Young Adolescents × Social Influence | −0.04 | 0.01 | t(9633.64) = −3.44 | .001 |
ΔRating × Midadolescents × Social Influence | −0.01 | 0.01 | t(9609.38) = −0.78 | .434 |
ΔRating × Adults × Social Influence | −0.01 | 0.01 | t(9641.82) = −0.85 | .393 |
Note: Effect coding was used for social-influence group (1 = adults; −1 = teenagers), whereas dummy coding was used for age group; young adults was used as the baseline group. The estimated standard deviations of the random effects were 0.14 (Δrating) and 0.08 (first rating). The standard deviation of the residuals was 1.02.