Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Dec 10;232(11):2017–2028. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3832-7

Table 4.

MNI coordinates and statistics for brain regions showing significant response for the main effect of difficulty (Random > Ordered, collapsed across all other conditions). Regions grouped by contiguous clusters. Z scores drawn from local maxima. Peak p was < 0.001 for all clusters.

Brain Area Hemisphere Brodmann Area z score x,y,z (mm) Cluster Size (# of Voxels)
Middle Temporal Gyrus L 22 > 8.2 -60, -34, 1 1480
Middle Temporal Gyrus L 21 6.71 -63, -22, -5
Superior Temporal Gyrus L 21 6.12 -51, -25, -5
Middle Temporal Gyrus R 21 7.28 66, -22, -5 1143
Middle Temporal Gyrus R 21 6.79 60, -13, -8
Superior Temporal Gyrus R 21 6.74 51, -28, 1
Middle Frontal Gyrus L 9 7.08 -39, 11, 28 1428
Insula L 13 6.91 -30, 23, 4
Orbitalfrontal Cortex L 47 6.66 -36, 20,-2
Inferior Frontal Gyrus (extending into thalamus) R 47 6.86 33, 26, -5 2182
Inferior Frontal Gyrus R 45 6.53 33, 26, 7
Middle Frontal Gyrus R 46 5.22 42, 17, 25
Superior Frontal Gyrus L 6 6.42 -6, 11, 55 927
Superior Frontal Gyrus L 8 5.69 -3, 20, 52
Superior Frontal Gyrus R 8 5.47 6, 26, 49
Cerebellum R 6.32 3, -55, -20 1771
Cerebellum R 6.12 9, -76, -17
Cerebellum L 6.11 -3, -82, -14