Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Jan 31;232(11):2007–2016. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-3865-6

Table 2.

Mean (± SEM) response latencies and pellet retrieval latencies (in sec) in cocaine-naïve (coc-naïve) and cocaine-experienced (coc-exp) monkeys.

Response latency, SD Response latency, SDR Retrieval latency, SD Retrieval latency, SDR
SD/SDR ACQUISITION
Coc-naïve (n=9) 2.9 (0.4) 3.4 (0.7) 1.6 (0.5) 1.2 (0.2)
Coc-exp (n=5) 2.1 (0.4) 2.8 (0.4) 1.5 (0.3) 1.3 (0.4)
MONTH 1
Coc-naïve 2.4 (0.2) 2.8 (0.3) 1.2 (0.2) 1.3 (0.2)
Coc-exp 2.8 (0.5) 3.4 (0.8) 1.0 (0.2) 1.0 (0.2)
MONTH 2
Coc-naïve 2.0 (0.2) 2.2 (0.1) 1.3 (0.3) 1.2 (0.2)
Coc-exp 2.8 (0.8) 2.7 (0.8) 1.4 (0.3) 1.1 (0.2)
MONTH 3
Coc-naïve 2.9 (0.4) 3.4 (0.7) 1.6 (0.5) 1.2 (0.2)
Coc-exp 2.1 (0.4) 2.8 (0.4) 1.5 (0.3) 1.3 (0.4)
Response latency, sample Response latency, match Retrieval latency
DMS
Coc-naïve (n=8) 1.4 (0.2) 3.0 (0.4) 1.5 (0.3)
Coc-exp (n=5) 2.1 (0.4) 2.4 (0.3) 1.0 (0.2)