Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 13;21(9-10):1483–1494. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0474

Table 1.

Experimental Protocol and Outcomes

Chronic perforation model creation TMs (n) Outcome (% chronic perforations)
Mouse model of chronic TM perforation (model 1)—total
 KB-R7785 group 58 87.9% (51 of 58)
 Saline group 20 0% (0 of 20)
Mouse model with surgery for eustachian tube obstruction (model 2)
 KB-R7785 group 42 100% (42 of 42)
Mouse model of CSOM (model 3)—CSOM group 1
 KB-R7785 group 16 100% (16 of 16)
Mouse model of CSOM (model 3)—CSOM group 2
 KB-R7785 group 17 100% (17 of 17)
HB-EGF treatment of chronic perforations   Outcome (% complete closure of perforation)
Mouse model of chronic TM perforation (model 1)—total 50  
 Treatment group 24 92% (22 of 24)
 Control group 26 38% (10 of 26)
Mouse model with surgery for eustachian tube obstruction (model 2) 42  
 Treatment group 19 94% (18 of 19)
 Control group 23 9% (2 of 23)
Mouse model of CSOM (model 3)—CSOM group 1 16  
 Treatment group 8 100% (8 of 8)
 Control group 8 50% (4 of 8)
Mouse model of CSOM (model 3)—CSOM group 2 17  
 Treatment group 8 100% (8 of 8)
 Control group 9 33.3% (3 of 9)
Mouse model of CSOM (model 3)—CSOM groups combined 33  
 Treatment group 16 100% (16 of 16)
 Control group 17 41% (7 of 17)

Table shows the outcomes of the creation of the chronic perforation models as well as the HB-EGF treatment in these models.

CSOM, chronic suppurative otitis media; HB-EGF, heparin binding–epidermal growth factor; TM, tympanic membrane.