Table 3. Summary of comparison of CVR and its z-maps.
CVR | z-map | |
---|---|---|
Sensitivity | Low: mainly identifies presence/absence of steal | Higher sensitivity by detecting graded reductions in CVR short of steal. |
Specificity | High: steal is accepted sign of abnormal vasculature. | Lower specificity mitigated by (1) normalization of CVR to normal range for region highlights abnormal CVR and (2) confluence of reduced z-scores is statistically unlikely in tissue with normal CVR |
Anatomic location specificity | No: CVR maps score absolute values of CVR | Yes: z-score normalizes CVR for anatomic location |
Identification of abnormality distribution | Identifies only the distribution where steal occurs as abnormal | Identifies the distributions of various grades of reduced CVR beyond that of steal |
Platform specificity | CVR can be performed on any magnet, however, CVR is specific for that magnet | Probably: each platform may require its own unique atlas |
Comparison across platforms | Possibly: requires, at a minimum, standardized MR sequence parameters and uniform stimulus across platforms | Yes: requires only consistency of sequences and stimulus between atlas and patient within each platform: z-values should then be comparable across platforms |
CVR, cerebrovascular reactivity; MR, magnetic resonance.