Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 27;2015:867516. doi: 10.1155/2015/867516

Table 2.

Comparing the prediction performance by the proposed method and some state-of-the-art works on the yeast dataset. Here, N/A means not available.

Model Test set SN (%) PPV (%) ACC (%) MCC (%)
Proposed method SVM 85.74 ± 0.94 93.84 ± 0.98 90.06 ± 0.64 82.03 ± 1.03

Guos' work ACC 89.93 ± 3.68 88.87 ± 6.16 89.33 ± 2.67 N/A
AC 87.30 ± 4.68 87.82 ± 4.33 87.36 ± 1.38 N/A

Zhous' work SVM + LD 87.37 ± 0.22 89.50 ± 0.60 88.56 ± 0.33 77.15 ± 0.68

Yangs' work Cod1 75.81 ± 1.20 74.75 ± 1.23 75.08 ± 1.13 N/A
Cod2 76.77 ± 0.69 82.17 ± 1.35 80.04 ± 1.06 N/A
Cod3 78.14 ± 0.90 81.86 ± 0.99 80.41 ± 0.47 N/A
Cod4 81.03 ± 1.74 90.24 ± 1.34 86.15 ± 1.17 N/A