Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec;41(12):1437–1457. doi: 10.1177/0093854814537626

Table 4:

AUC Values for the Recidivistic Outcomes Across Entire as Well as Fixed 1-, 3-, and 5-Year Follow-Up Periods

Overall Sample (N = 3,264)
Male Subgroup (n = 2,951)
Female Subgroup (n = 313)
Recidivistic Outcomes AUC (SE) 95% CI p AUC (SE) 95% CI p AUC (SE) 95% CI p
General
 Entire follow-up .64 (.01) [.62, .66] <.001 .65 (.01) .63, .67 <.001 .59 (.04) .53, .66 .008
 1-year follow-up .64 (.01) [.62, .67] <.001 .64 (.01) .62, .67 <.001 .66 (.04) .58, .74 .001
 3-year follow-up .65 (.01) [.63, .67] <.001 .66 (.01) .64, .68 <.001 .62 (.04) .55, .70 .002
 5-year follow-up .65 (.01) [.62, .68] <.001 .66 (.02) .63, .69 <.001 .65 (.04) .57, .74 .001
Nonviolent
 Entire follow-up .63 (.01) [.61, .65] <.001 .64 (.01) .62, .66 <.001 .59 (.04) .52,.66 .010
 1-year follow-up .64 (.01) [.61, .67] <.001 .64 (.02) .61, .67 <.001 .65 (.04) .57, .74 .001
 3-year follow-up .64 (.01) [.61, .66] <.001 .64 (.01) .62, .66 <.001 .62 (.04) .54, .69 .004
 5-year follow-up .65 (.01) [.62, .67] <.001 .65 (.02) .62, .68 <.001 .64 (.04) .56, .73 .002
Violent
 Entire follow-up .61 (.02) [.58, .64] <.001 .62 (.02) .59, .65 <.001
 1-year follow-up .61 (.03) [.56, .66] <.001 .62 (.03) .57, .67 <.001
 3-year follow-up .62 (.02) [.58, .65] <.001 .63 (.02) .59, .66 <.001
 5-year follow-up .63 (.02) [.58, .67] <.001 .65 (.02) .60, .69 <.001

Note. All the p values in bold remained statistically significant even after FDR corrections. AUC values for violent recidivism were not reported for the female subgroup given that only 3 (1.0%) females committed violent offenses during the follow-up period. The AUC values did not differ significantly across the follow-up periods for the various recidivistic outcomes. AUC = area under curve; FDR = False Discovery Rate.