Table 1.
Parameters | Base | Range | Ref. |
Costs (I$: equivalent to 2012 USD) | |||
Cost of cancer (annual) | I$3376 | [26-29] (conversion-ratio) | |
Cost of screening (endoscopy + mucosal iodine staining + biopsy) | I$64 | I$58.5-63.6 | [13] |
Cost of EGD | I$35.8 | [30] | |
Cost of biopsy | I$28.2 | [30] | |
Cost of HRME | I$35.8 | ||
Cost of EMR | I$1292 | I$1292-1620 | [13] |
Cost of EMR-related stricture | I$1111 | [31] (conversion-ratio) | |
Cost of EMR-related perforation | I$1786 | [31] (conversion-ratio) | |
Cost of esophagectomy | I$1768 | I$1485-2171 | [13] |
Cost of post surgery state (annual) | I$136 | [19,27,28] (conversion-ratio) | |
Discount rate, % | 0.03 | ||
Transition probabilities | |||
Non-neoplasia to mild dysplasia | Calibrated to overall annual ESCC incidence rate by age group-CI5[10]Overall cumulative incidence in follow-up study[11] | ||
Mild to moderate dysplasia | |||
Moderate to severe dysplasia | |||
Severe dysplasia to IMC | |||
IMC to operable cancer | |||
Screening test characteristics (per patient) | |||
Lugol’s iodine testing | |||
Sensitivity | 0.99 | [8] | |
Specificity | 0.15 | [8] | |
HRME testing | |||
Sensitivity | 0.99 | [8] | |
Specificity | 0.82 | [8] | |
Efficacy of EMR | |||
Complete long-term remission | 0.62 | [32] | |
Adherence rate (compliance of screening) | |||
After positive biopsy | 0.70 | [13] | |
Procedure characteristics | |||
Operative candidate, cancer | 0.86 | [33] | |
Surgical resectability rate | |||
Surveillance | 0.76 | [33] | |
No surveillance | 0.33 | [14,15] | |
Complications of therapy | |||
Post-EMR stricture rate | 0.05 | [34] | |
Post-EMR perforation rate | 0.02 | [34] | |
Post-RFA structure rate | 0.14 | [25] | |
Complication rate from EGD | < 0.01 | [14,35,36] | |
Mortality from EGD complication | < 0.01 | [14,35,36] |
C15: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents; EGD: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; HRME: High-resolution microendoscopy; IMC: Intramucosal carcinoma; RFA: Radiofrequency ablation.