Table 4.
Observational assessment after intraperitoneal administration of fentanyl analogs in mice.
| PNS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comp. | Dose | CNS | After manipulations | Reflexes | ANS |
| Control | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Low | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | ++ | + | + | + | |
| High | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | |
| 6 | Low | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | ++ | ++ | 0 | 0 | |
| High | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | |
| 7 | Low | + | + | 0 | + |
| Medium | ++ | ++ | + | + | |
| High | ++ | +++ | + | ++ | |
| 8 | Low | ++ | + | 0 | + |
| Medium | ++ | +++ | ++ | + | |
| High | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | |
Mice were intraperitoneally administered 0.25 (Low), 0.50 (Medium), and 0.75 (High) LD50 of fentanyl analogs, viz., 5-8. The control animals received DMSO. Immediately after treatment, the animals were closely observed for 2 h by a blind observer for its effects on CNS, PNS (effects after manipulation and effects on reflexes) and ANS activities. The scorings were given as: 0 (no observational change), + (little activity), ++ (moderate flexibility), +++ (strong response) and ++++ (exaggerated response). Each treatment included three animals.