Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 16;12:12. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.12
General comments No. Percent Content-specific No. Percent
STR: Facilitator 112 10.6 Tools 129 12.2
STR: Training 99 9.4 Activities 107 10.1
STR: Will Apply 70 6.6 Group Work 99 9.4
STR: Networking 62 5.9 Role Playing 76 7.2
STR: Notebook 18 1.7 Topic/Theme 50 4.7
STR: Seli-Learning 8 0.8 Discussion 44 4.2
STR: Arrangements 2 0.2 Skills-Build 36 3.4
Topic Was Review 12 1.1 Information 36 3.4
Topic Was New 11 1.0 Interactive 31 2.9
Inverts Q: Training 5 0.5 Handouts 14 1.3
Inverts Q: Content 2 0.2 Examples 13 1.2
Inverts Q: Trainer 2 0.2 Definitions 11 1.0
Inverts Q: Time 1 0.1 Power-Point 8 0.8
TOTAL 404 38.2% TOTAL 654 61.8%
"N/A" or Left Blank 346 404 + 654 + 228 = 1,286

Comments coded by theme and topic, whereas the word cloud produced proportional image of 50 common terms. CODES: STR=strength (Affective-Supportive) such as Facilitator sensitive to participant needs (112); Training, “Everything was effective” (99); Networking was “beneficial” (62); Notebook “useful” (18). “Will apply” refers to reflection on how information would be used, especially by mentioning “clients.” For a few, the topic was “review” (12) or “new” (11). Inverts Question (10)=negative comment that countered, “What was most effective?” Content-Specific identified general or specific tools (129) and activities (107), at the high end, and definitions (11) and power-point (8), at the low end. Infrequent terms were merged into one representation, e.g., exercises ~ activities; group work ~ small-group; trainer ~ facilitator, among others. No “negative” terms among these top fifty.