Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroradiol. 2012 May 24;40(2):81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2012.03.006

Table 2.

Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound (US) and conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of germinal matrix hemorrhage (GMH) and periventricular hemorrhagic infarction (PVHI) vs susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI).

Grade II GMH Grade III GMH PVHI

Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity
US 0% (0/10) 100% (14/14) 100% (9/9) 93.3% (14/15) 66.7% (2/3) 100% (21/21)
T1WI 50% (5/10) 100% (14/14) 100% (9/9) 100% (15/15) 100% (3/3) 100% (21/21)
T2WI 100% (10/10) 100% (14/14) 100% (9/9) 100% (15/15) 100% (3/3) 100% (21/21)
FLAIR 10% (1/10) 100% (14/14) 100% (9/9) 100% (15/15) 100% (3/3) 100% (21/21)
DTI—ADC 30% (3/10) 100% (14/14) 100% (9/9) 100% (15/15) 100% (3/3) 100% (21/21)

US: ultrasound; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; GMH: germinal matrix hemorrhage; PVHI: periventricular hemorrhagic infarction; SWI: susceptibility-weighted imaging; T1/T2WI: T1-weighted/T2-weighted imaging; FLAIR: fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; DTI: diffusion tensor imaging; ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient.