Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Aug 4;22(5):392–406. doi: 10.1037/a0037156

Table 3.

Structural equation models for depressive symptoms, withdrawal-relevant negative affect, craving, general negative affect, and general positive affect.

Variable/Path Est Bias-Corrected 95% CI StdXY χ2 (df) p-value RMSEA (90% CI) Prob. ≤ .05 CFI WRMR
Depressive Symptoms
Pre-quit slope on fluoxetine (as) −0.563 (−1.343, 0.187) −0.260 3.64 (6) 0.725 0.000 (0.000, 0.066) 0.893 1.000 0.260
 TQD abst on pre-tx intercept (bi) −0.039 (−0.081, 0.811) −0.233
TQD abst on pre-quit slope (bs) −0.474 (−35.64, −0.183)** −0.498
 TQD abst on FTND −0.157 (−1.893, −0.055)* −0.317
 TQD abst on fluoxetine (c′) −0.266 (−18.207, 0.146) −0.130
Withdrawal-Relevant Negative Affect
Pre-quit slope on fluoxetine (as) −0.069 (−0.118, −0.019)** −0.270 22.38 (23) 0.497 0.000 (0.000, 0.056) 0.916 1.000 0.539
 TQD abst on pre-tx intercept (bi) −0.740 (−1.319, −0.058)* −0.284
TQD abst on pre-quit slope (bs) −3.717 (−7.136, −1.480)** −0.465
 TQD abst on FTND −0.107 (−0.208, −0.018)** −0.217
 TQD abst on fluoxetine (c′) −0.257 (−0.690, 0.154) −0.125
Cravinga
Pre-quit slope on fluoxetine (as) −0.054 (−0.109, −0.004)* −0.233 23.01 (23) 0.520 0.000 (0.000, 0.054) 0.924 1.000 0.560
 TQD abst on pre-tx intercept (bi) 0.771 (0.019, 3.934)* 0.320
TQD abst on pre-quit slope (bs) −4.345 (−12.40, −1.566)** −0.488
 TQD abst on FTND −0.249 (−0.618, −0.120)** −0.503
 Pre-tx intercept on FTND 0.119 (0.082, −0.153)** 0.581
 TQD abst on fluoxetine (c′) −0.234 (−0.879, 0.235) −0.114
General Negative Affectb
Pre-quit slope (linear) on fluoxetine (as) −0.209 (−1.194, 1.135) −0.168 18.63 (17) 0.350 0.022 (0.000, 0.068) 0.800 0.995 0.494
Pre-quit slope (curv) on fluoxetine (ac) −0.030 (−0.396, 0.243) −0.058
 TQD abst on pre-tx intercept (bi) −0.119 (−0.715, −0.032)** −0.525
TQD abst on pre-quit slope (linear) (bs) −1.704 (−8.376, −0.499)** −1.236
TQD abst on pre-quit slope (curv) (bc) −0.165 (−2.920, 5.157) −0.024
 TQD abst on FTND −0.283 (−2.226, −0.151)** −0.647
 TQD abst on fluoxetine (c′) −0.349 (−6.828, 0.349) −0.209
General Positive Affect c
Pre-quit slope on fluoxetine (as) 0.196 (−0.518, 0.939) 0.057 29.88 (23) 0.153 0.038 (0.000, 0.073) 0.674 0.970 0.599
 TQD abst on pre-tx intercept (bi) 0.043 (0.007, 0.079)* 0.260
TQD abst on pre-quit slope (bs) 0.115 (−0.078, 0.292) 0.193
 TQD abst on FTND −0.104 (−0.119, −0.021)** −0.201
 TQD abst on fluoxetine (c′) −0.022 (−0.408, 0.335) −0.011
*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.00.

TQD: target quit date; pre-tx: pre-treatment; FTND: Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence; Est: estimate; SE: standard error; CI: confidence interval; stdXY: fully standardized; RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation; CFI: Comparative Fit Index; WRMR: weighted root mean square residual.

Note: Pre-treatment intercepts for all variables were not significantly associated with gender (not presented in the table). Gender and FTND were included as covariates, predicting pre-treatment intercepts and pre-quit slope as well as TQD abstinence in all models; however, only significant relationships are presented here (gender was not related to intercept, slope, or TQD abstinence in any models).

a

The association between baseline nicotine dependence levels and pre-treatment intercept for each variable was estimated in each model (not presented in the table).

b

The linear growth models for all but general negative affect had adequate-to-good model fit. A quadratic growth model for general negative affect was estimated and the model fitted the data well. Baseline nicotine dependence was significantly associated only with pre-treatment intercept of craving.

c

The pre-treatment intercept and slope of were significantly correlated only in the positive affect model.