Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2012 May 4;22(4):814–822. doi: 10.1002/pon.3079

Table 3.

Sexual problems, communication pattern, and social role on depressive symptoms

Mutual Constructive Communication Pattern Demand-Withdraw Communication Pattern

B SE T R B SE t r
Intercept 15.96 2.46 16.71 .65
Pain .21 .16 1.29 .21 .16 1.33
Physical well-being −.07 .09 −.75 −.10 .09 −1.05
Functional well-being −.49 .09 −5.57*** .42 −.45 .08 −5.39*** .40
Dyadic adjustment −.05 .09 −.51 −.07 .09 −.85
Sexual problems 2.65 .95 2.77** .15 2.33 .93 2.50* .14
Communication Pattern −.16 .07 −2.14* .12 .19 .08 2.31* .13
Social role −1.24 .94 −1.32 −1.51 .93 −1.61
Sexual Problems × Communication .17 .10 1.72 −.25 .11 −2.31* .13
Sexual Problems × Social role 1.03 1.42 .73 1.14 1.39 .82
Communication × Social role −.24 .10 −2.35* .15 .28 .11 2.47* .13
Sexual problems Communication × Social role −.43 .15 −2.73** .14 −.62 .16 3.87*** .24

B, raw coefficient; SE, standard error; Social Role (patient = 1; partner = −1). Effect size r = [t2/(t2 + df)]1/2.

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.

***

p < 0.0001.