Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 20;25(5):860–878. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1581-2

Table 1.

Study characteristics

Authors Operation period Location N Follow-up (months) Age (years; mean/range) Operative technique details Design Included for
Studies on LAGB
 Abu-Abeid et al. [27] NR Tel-Aviv, Israel 11 6–36 15.7 Perigastric Retrospective M – CO – CM
 Al-Qahtani [28] Jan, 2003–12/2005 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 51 3–34 16.8 Pars flaccida Retrospective CM
 Alqahtani [29] 6/2004–12/2007 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 50 NR–60 17 Pars flaccida Retrospective CO
 Angrisani et al. [30] 1/1996–12/2003 Naples, Italy 58 0–84 18.0 55 perigastric; 3 pars flaccida Retrospective M – CO – CM
 Dolan et al. [31] 1996–NR Brisbane, Australia—Royal Brisbane Hospital 17 12–46 16.7 Since 1999 pars flaccida Prospective M
 Fielding et al. [32] 1998–2003 Brisbane, Australia—Wesley Hospital 41 1–70 15.6 Since 1999 pars flaccida Retrospective CO – CM
 Holterman et al. [14] 3/2005–6/2007 Chicago, IL, USA 20 15–42 16 Perigastric Prospective M – CO – CM – QOL
 Inge et al. [33] 2/2007–12/2011 Five centers, USA 14 1 17.1 Pars flaccida Prospective CO
 Lee et al. [34] 2002–2011 New York, NY, USA—St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center 23 1–24 17.2 Pars flaccida Retrospective CO – CM
 Lennerz et al. [35] 1/2005–12/2010 23 centers, Germany 10 0 to >30 16.7 NA Prospective M
 Messiah et al. [36] 4/2004–10/2010 360 facilities, USA 436 0–12 18.5 NA Prospective database CM
 Nadler et al. [37] 9/2001–1/2007 New York, NY, USA—NY University School of Medicine 73 12–24 15.8 Pars flaccida Prospective M – CO – CM
 O’Brien et al. [15] 5/2005–9/2008 Melbourne, Australia 25 24 16.5 Pars flaccida RCT M – CO – QOL
 Silberhumer et al. [17] 1998–2004 Salzburg/Vienna, Austria 50 63–138 17.1 Pars flaccida Retrospective multicenter M – CO – CM – QOL
 Silva et al. [38] 7/2001–6/2010 Oporto, Portugal 14 12–36 16.3 Pars flaccida M – CO – CM
 Varela et al. [39] 2002–2006 59 university centers, USA 90 1 12–18 NA Retrospective CO
 Yitzhak et al. [18] 2000–2003 Beer Sheva, Israel 60 25–65 16 Two pars flaccida techniques Retrospective M – CO – CM – QOL
 Zitsman et al. [40] 8/2006–NR New York, NY, USA—Columbia University Medical Center 100 12 14–19 Pars flaccida NR M – CO – CM
Studies on RYGB
 De la Cruz-Munoz et al. [41] 2001–2010 Miami, FL, USA 71 9–15 18.3 NR Retrospective M – CO
 Inge et al. [42] 2001–2003 Cincinnati, OH, USA 10 1–24 NR Two open/Eight laparoscopic, hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy Retrospective CO – CM
 Inge et al. [33] 2/2007–12/2011 Five centers, USA 161 1 17.1 NA Prospective CO
 Lee et al. [34] 2002–2011 New York, NY, USA—St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center 32 1–24 18.6 Pouch 50 mL/40-cm biliopancreatic limb, 100-cm alimentary limb Retrospective CO – CM
 Messiah et al. [36] 4/2004–10/2010 360 facilities, USA 454 12 18.5 NA Prospective database CM
 Miyano et al. [43] 8/2002–5/2007 Cincinnati, OH, USA 77 3 16.8 Biliopancreatic limb 75–150 cm/15–30 cm from Treitz/30–45-mL pouch Retrospective CO – CM
 Nijhawan et al. [44] 2001–2007 (approx.) San Diego, CA, USA 20 60–120 16.9 Pouch 15 mL/Roux limb 75 cm Retrospective M – CO – CM
 Olbers et al. [22] 2/2006–6/2009 Gothenburg, Sweden 81 24 16.5 Pouch <20 mL/Roux limb 80 cm Prospective M – CO – CM – QOL
 Strauss et al. [45] 4/1985–5/1999 New Brunswick, NJ, USA 10 8–156 16.2 Pouch 20 ± 5 mL/Roux limb 50–150 cm or to distal jejunum Retrospective M – CO – CM
 Sugerman et al. [19] 1981–1/2002 Richmond, VA, USA 33 1–14 16 Standard, long-limb, and distal gastric bypass Retrospective M – CO – CM
 Varela et al. [39] 2002–2006 59 university centers, USA 191 1 12-18 NA Retrospective CO
 Zeller et al. [20] 5/2004–1/2007 Cincinnati, OH, USA 31 12 16.4 Pouch 20 mL/5–10 cm from Treitz/Roux limb 100–150 cm [46] Prospective QOL
 Zeller et al. [21] 5/2004–9/2005 Cincinnati, OH, USA 16/14 24 16.2 Pouch 20 mL/5–10 cm from Treitz/Roux limb 100–150 cm [46] Prospective M – QOL
Studies on LSG
 Aldaqal et al. [23] 11/2009–2/2012 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 32 12 15.2 50–80-mL lumen Prospective M – CO – CM – QOL
 Alqahtani et al. [47] 3/2006–2/2011 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 99 6–24 14 NR Retrospective M – CO – CM
 Boza et al. [48] 1/2006–10/2009 Santiago, Chile 51 6–24 18 60-F calibration catheter Retrospective M – CO – CM
 Inge et al. [33] 2/2007–12/2011 Five centers, USA 67 1 17.1 NA Prospective CO
 Lennerz et al. [35] 1/2005–12/2010 23 centers, Germany 11 12 15.4 NA Prospective M – CM
 Nadler et al. [49] 1/2010–12/2011 Washington, DC, USA 23 9–15 17.3 40-F bougie Retrospective M – CO – CM
 Varela et al. [39] 2002–2006 59 university centers, USA 28 1 12–18 NA Retrospective CO

Studies included for meta-analysis and systematic review, marked gray if only eligible for semiquantitative analysis

NR not reported, NA not applicable, M meta-analysis, CO complications, CM comorbidity, QOL quality of life assessment