Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comp Neurol. 2014 Apr 12;522(14):3262–3280. doi: 10.1002/cne.23595

Table 2.

Passive and active membrane properties of control and Kcnq2-null DRG neurons.

control Kcnq2-null
Passive properties
Cm (pF) 39 ± 3.3 45 ± 4.1
Initial RMP (mV) −58 ± 2.5 −56 ± 1.6
Pre-drug firing properties
Fast AHP peak (mV) −83 ± 1.3 −86 ± 0.97*
AP rheobase (nA) 0.77 ± 0.23 0.81 ± 0.16
1 times rheobase (#APs) 2.1 ± 0.38 2.9 ± 0.75
2 times rheobase (#APs) 5.8 ± 1.3 11 ± 2.8
3 times rheobase (#APs) 8.0 ± 1.3 17. ± 4.4*
Absolute stimulus (#APs) 16 ± 1.6 25 ± 5.2*
Slow AHP peak (mV) −74 ± 1.9 −68 ± 1.2**
Post-drug firing properties
Fast AHP peak (mV) −82 ± 0.97 −84 ± 1.21
AP rheobase (nA) 0.39 ± 0.07 0.88 ± 0.19*
1 times rheobase (#APs) 4.0 ± 1.1 2.5 ± 0.66
2 times rheobase (#APs) 11 ± 2.0 9.2 ± 2.2
3 times rheobase (#APs) 13 ± 2.2 16 ± 2.9
Absolute stimulus (#APs) 21 ± 2.2 23 ± 3.9
Slow AHP peak (mV) −66 ± 1.2 −67 ± 1.6

Twenty-five DRG neurons from five animals were recorded in the control and Kcnq2-null groups. Values are means ± SEM. Cm = membrane capacitance; RMP = resting membrane potential; AHP = afterhyperpolarization potential; fast AHP peak = AHP undershoot peak magnitude after single 3-ms stimulus; AP rheobase = either the minimum amount of current required to evoke a single AP, or 0.1 nA (whichever one was smallest); 1, 2, and 3 times rheobase = the number of APs fired by a DRG neuron during a 500-ms depolarizing current step of a magnitude 1, 2, or 3 times its rheobase, respectively; absolute = the maximum number of APs fired in response to a single 500-ms depolarizing current step of 0.1–0.9 nA magnitude (in 0.1-nA increments); slow AHP peak = AHP undershoot magnitude after 500-ms stimulus at 0.4nA. Values of Cm of the control DRG neurons were compared to mutant neurons using unpaired 2-sample Student’s t-test with equal variance; AHP and AP rheobase were compared with 2-way ANOVA with Tukey test; numbers of APs were compared with two-way repeated measures ANOVA.

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01.