Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 Jan 19;124(2):329–342. doi: 10.1037/abn0000029

Table 4.

Predicting emerging adult outcomes from adolescent subtypes of youth antisocial behavior

Outcome Contrast Code 1: Presence of AB Contrast code 2: age of onset of AB Contrast Code 1: Presence of AB Contrast code 2: age of onset of AB Aggressive symptoms Rule Breaking Symptoms CU traits (age 17)
Step 1 Step 2
Any arrest/petition? (adolescence) .33 (.07)** .62 (.26)* .14 (.09) .21 (.29) .75 (.30)* .47 (.16)** .09 (.06)
Self-reported delinquency .24 (.04)** .11(13) .22 (.04)** .07 (.13) .04 (.10) .03 (.07) .001 (.03)
APD symptoms .17 (.02)** .31 (.06)** .14 (.02)** .22 (.07)** .13 (.05)** .04 (.03)+ −.005 (.01)
APD diagnosis .35 (.11)** .56 (.26)* .26 (.11)* .25 (.31) .63 (.31)+ .03 (.17) −.03 (.10)
Depression .34 (.16)* .16 (.30) .24 (.18)+ −.23 (.37) .65 (.27)* .03 (.21) −.15 (.11)
Substance Abuse .33 (.08)** .49 (.29)+ .26 (.09)** .29 (.29) .33 (.22) .07 (.14) .07 (.08)
Substance Dependence .37 (.10)** .56 (.28)+ .27 (.12)* .28 (.30) .46 (.25)+ .11 (.15) .09 (.09)
CU traits (age 20) .24 (.06)** .17 (.22) .19 (.07)* .01 (.21) .03 (.16) .08 (.11) .28 (.05)**
Any arrest/petition? (adult) .36 (.07)** .74 (.25)** .33 (.08)** .67 (.27)* .05 (.20) .08 (.14) .07 (.06)

N=266

+

p<.10

*

p<.05

**

p<.01.

All tests two-tailed. Each box represents unstandardized regression coeffecients with (SE). Patterns for Alcohol abuse and dependence were identical to substance abuse and dependence finding. Self-reported delinquency and APD symptoms were log transformed to account for their skew. Logistic regression was used for all binary outcomes and linear regression for all continuous outcomes. Similar regressions were explored using dummy-coded trajectory groups and interactions with CU traits at age 17 to predict adult outcomes. None of these interactions were statistically significant and are thus not reported but are available upon request.