Table 1.
2009 (n=375) | 2011 (n=361) | 2013 (n=403) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAC (+) | CAC (-) | CAC (+) | CAC (-) | CAC (+) | CAC (-) | |
CAC noted | 1 | 0 | 74 | 0 | 122 | 0 |
CAC not noted | 73 | 301 | 29 | 258 | 14 | 267 |
Sensitivity | 1% | Sensitivity | 72%a | Sensitivity | 90%b | |
Specificity | 100% | Specificity | 100% | Specificity | 100% | |
CAC (+) | CAC (-) | CAC (+) | CAC (-) | CAC (+) | CAC (-) | |
CAD noted | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 17 | 0 |
CAD not noted | 74 | 301 | 95 | 258 | 119 | 267 |
Accuracy | 0% | Accuracy | 8%c | Accuracy | 13%d |
p < .0001 versus 2009
p = .0006 versus 2011
p = .0215 versus 2009
p = .0008 versus 2009