Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 14;47(6):1193–1201. doi: 10.1007/s00726-015-1946-9

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Effect of AminoL40 administration on mechanical paw withdrawal threshold after EC. The mechanical withdrawal threshold in the EC-AminoL40 group was significantly higher than in the EC-Con group on days 1 and 2. Values are shown as mean ± SE (EC-Con and EC-AminoL40 groups, n = 11 for each group). *p < 0.05 compared with the EC-Con group