Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 13;7:377–390. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.01.007

Table 3.

Comparison of edges between cognitively normal individuals and AD-dementia patients for three types of graphs at 9% sparsity.

Type of edge Pearson correlation
Pearson correlation
(controlling for mean cortical thickness)
Partial correlation

Normal AD Normal AD Normal AD
Common edges  58%  43%  19%
Contralateral edges 47% 23% 49% 33% 45% 47%
Within lobe & hemisphere 29% 35% 24% 38% 19% 17%
Frontal 58% 49% 56% 54% 51% 59%
Parietal 66% 52% 58% 46% 40% 39%
Temporal 21% 35% 22% 29% 45% 39%
Occipital 5% 6% 10% 12% 20% 24%
Frontal–parietal 29% 17% 23% 19% 10% 12%
Frontal–temporal 4% 6% 7% 7% 14% 17%
Frontal–occipital 0% 0% 0% 1% 8% 11%
Parietal–temporal 10% 12% 8% 9% 15% 10%
Parietal–occipital 4% 3% 6% 2% 4% 7%
Temporal–parietal 0% 3% 0% 3% 4% 4%

Note: Common edges refers to edges that are present in the graphs of both the normal and the AD group; within lobe and hemisphere refers to edges that connect nodes representing brain regions within the same lobe and hemisphere (i.e., local connections); frontal refers to edges that connect a node representing frontal lobe cortex to a node in the same lobe or in another lobe; parietal, temporal, and occipital are defined similarly as frontal; frontal–parietal represent edges that connect a node representing frontal lobe tissue to a node representing parietal lobe tissue.