Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 13;29(5):681–690. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.24

Table 1. Bimodal in vivo imaging findings for PPC transplant recipients.

Recipient designation (115, grouped by injection site outcome) OCT findings
fcSLO findings
Injection site (noted complications)
  Day Day  
  0 8 15 0 8 15  
1 SB SB, VA SB, VA + + + Subretinal
2 SB SB, VA SB, VA + + + Subretinal
7 SB SB, VA SB, VA + + + Subretinal
11 SB SB, VA SB, VA + + Subretinal
10 SB SB SB + Subretinal (GR)
3 SB SB   + +   Subretinal
8 SB SB a + a a Subretinal (Cat.)
4 NAD NAD   +   Choroidal
5 NAD VA   +   Choroidal
6 NAD a   + a   Choroidal (Cat.)
9 NAD NAD NAD + Choroidal
12 VC VC VC + + + Vitreal (NRP)
13 VC VC VC + + Vitreal (NRP)
14 VC VC VC + + Vitreal (NRP)
15 VC NAD VA + Vitreal (NRP)

Abbreviations: Cat., cataract; GR, graft reflux; NAD, nothing abnormal detected. Ophthalmoscopy observations were in concordance with OCT findings above. Ophthalmoscopy could only detect subretinal blebs (SBs) at day 0 and vitreal clouding (VC, graft in the vitreous resulting from neural retinal puncture, NRP), while microscopic vitreal aggregates (VAs, indicators of host-site inflammation) overlying the graft site could not be detected. NAD, Cat., and GR were observed during injection. Presence (+) or absence (−) of fluorescent graft label (Qtracker) across the fundus; heterogeneous signal distribution and redistribution was seen for all recipients with positive signal over time. Blank boxes indicate end point at previous time point.

a

Cataract formation precluded complete bimodal imaging; OCT was able to resolve the retina and choroid at early stages of cataract formation; however, fcSLO could not penetrate the cataract.