Table 4.
Comparison of economic measures between YA and OA.
YA Mean ± SD | OA Mean ± SD | YA vs. OA p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Gains domain | |||
Uncertainty premium | |||
Risk Ambiguity Risk × Ambiguity |
0.65 ± 0.66 1.54 ± 1.46 r(35) = 0.33, p = 0.043 |
0.55 ± 0.61 1.46 ± 1.04 r(19) = 0.55, p = 0.009 |
0.52 0.81 |
Information strategies | |||
Choice strategy r2 rEV r2 pWIN |
0.16 ± 0.24 0.26 ± 0.14 0.10 ± 0.12 |
0.12 ± 0.22 0.21 ± 0.16 0.09 ± 0.11 |
0.43 0.15 0.75 |
Response time (s) | |||
Risk Ambiguity |
1.55 ± 0.61 1.35 ± 0.52 p = 0.046 |
2.49 ± 0.90 2.34 ± 0.83 p = 0.48 |
< 0.0001 |
Losses domain | |||
Uncertainty premium | |||
Risk Ambiguity Risk × Ambiguity |
0.22 ± 0.59 0.24 ± 0.78 r(56) = 0.77, p < 0.0001 |
-0.17 ± 0.31 -0.18 ± 0.40 r(33) = 0.68, p < 0.0001 |
<0.001 0.002 |
Information strategies | |||
Choice strategy r2 rEV r2 pWIN |
0.38 ± 0.15 0.40 ± 0.13 0.03 ± 0.04 |
0.31 ± 0.16 0.35 ± 0.13 0.04 ± 0.05 |
0.052 0.058 0.21 |
Response time (s) | |||
Risk Ambiguity |
1.74 ± 0.51 1.69 ± 0.46 p = 0.57 |
3.17 ± 1.27 3.37 ± 1.25 p = 0.49 |
< 0.0001 |
rEV, relative expected value; pWIN, probability of winning. Overall participants responded slower in the losses tasks than in the gains task with significant difference in OA (p < 0.01) and marginally significant difference in YA (p = 0.068). Bolded values corresponds to statistically significant test at p < 0.05.