Skip to main content
. 2015 May;61(5):e232–e239.

Table 2.

Summary of focus group comments regarding EMR work flow

WORK FLOW SUBDOMAIN THEMES SAMPLE QUOTATIONS
Clinical processes
  • Prescription writing work flow was very cumbersome

  • Drug interaction checking was too sensitive and sometimes not clinically relevant, and it could not be adjusted or turned off; considerable frustration was expressed

  • Clinical decision support systems were lacking; the EMR’s potential to support practice was recognized

  • “[I]f the person comes in, and they’re on a dozen meds and they say, ‘I need them all refilled today’ ... I warn them ahead of time now and say, ‘This is going to take 15 minutes’”

  • “I’ll ask them specifically about their parking: ‘Where are you parked and how much time [do] you have?’”

Workarounds
  • Workarounds were frequently mentioned as a source of frustration, associated with the cumbersome nature of EMR functionality

  • “The prescription piece [is] not user friendly .... I still write [paper] prescriptions out of sheer frustration sometimes. Sorry, I do”

  • “I would just find some kind of a workaround that I could get that patient out the door without pulling my hair out”

Time
  • The EMR typically increased time required for certain processes associated with system performance and clinical work flow

  • The EMR saved time—less frequently noted

  • “[T]he process to input someone’s family history literally now can take 20 to 25 minutes because each family member with each of their medical problems has to be entered individually”

Scope
  • Blurring of clinical and administrative processes changed the scope of the work (eg, providers doing work previously done by administrative staff, such as preparing requisitions, generating letters)

  • The volume of information available enabled providers to address more issues at a visit; participants were challenged to focus the scope of a visit, learners more so

  • Filtering information became crucial and was more challenging for learners

  • “I just think it’s a question of learning how to make sure that you don’t [do] ... work that could be done by someone else .... I think it does slow you down ... how much work I do that someone else could be doing is within my control. So it’s a question of learning it and, you know, teamwork”

Teaching
  • The ability to simultaneously view the chart and listen to and view the resident-patient encounter improved efficiency and effectiveness of postencounter debriefs and review of work

  • There was a need to augment teaching about communication and rapport building; the EMR was identified as a new third party to the patient-provider relationship

  • Some faculty preceptors were so busy learning the EMR they did not think they had maintained usual levels of clinical teaching

  • Faculty at the site with more EMR experience struggled with how best to use and share certain tools with learners, (eg, checklists and macros); concern was expressed that these could impede learning and assessment

  • “The notes are done quickly. You review them quickly, get them more quickly back [to the residents], and move on and it’s more efficient that way”

  • “I think having an EMR in the teaching clinic is crucial because I think that a huge learning objective is how to use an EMR .... And even there’s some teaching opportunities, huge teaching opportunities, about how to maintain the doctor-patient relationship when the EMR is there and how to not let the EMR detract from that because it can”

EMR—electronic medical record.