Skip to main content
. 2015 May 13;10(5):e0123917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123917

Table 3. Percentage of days spent in each conifer habitat during the breeding and post-breeding seasons, seasons when it would have been possible to observe evidence of breeding.

Year Whitebark pine (%) Limber pine (%) Douglas-fir (%) Lodgepole pine (%) Engelmann spruce (%) Subalpine fir (%)
2009 70.6 26.5 60.8 49.0 64.7 94.1
2010 48.5 53.5 92.9 77.8 92.9 90.9
2011 52.3 44.0 85.0 85.3 79.2 86.9
2012 67.0 39.7 65.2 67.0 62.4 92.2
2013 72.0 46.5 62.4 71.3 77.7 83.4

Numbers do not add up to 100% because I spent time in multiple habitats every day.