Table 3. Percentage of days spent in each conifer habitat during the breeding and post-breeding seasons, seasons when it would have been possible to observe evidence of breeding.
Year | Whitebark pine (%) | Limber pine (%) | Douglas-fir (%) | Lodgepole pine (%) | Engelmann spruce (%) | Subalpine fir (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 70.6 | 26.5 | 60.8 | 49.0 | 64.7 | 94.1 |
2010 | 48.5 | 53.5 | 92.9 | 77.8 | 92.9 | 90.9 |
2011 | 52.3 | 44.0 | 85.0 | 85.3 | 79.2 | 86.9 |
2012 | 67.0 | 39.7 | 65.2 | 67.0 | 62.4 | 92.2 |
2013 | 72.0 | 46.5 | 62.4 | 71.3 | 77.7 | 83.4 |
Numbers do not add up to 100% because I spent time in multiple habitats every day.