Table 5.
Percentage weight change by additive behavior | p-(quartiles) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | Yes | ||||
n | Median (quartiles) | n | Median(quartiles) | ||
Any Addictive Behavior Disorder-SCID criteria | 167 | −30.7 (−38.0,−25.4) | 34 | −30.3 (−36.4,−26.7) | 0.94 |
Alcohol Use Disorder-SCID criteria | 185 | −30.7 (−38.0,−25.4) | 16 | −29.6 (−36.6,−25.9) | 0.59 |
Alcohol Use Disorder- SCID/AUDIT criteria | 142 | −31.7 (−38.8,−26.1) | 34 | −29.9 (−34.4,−26.7) | 0.44 |
Non-Substance Use Addictive Disorder | 182 | −30.7 (−37.9,−25.4) | 19 | −30.0 (−36.4,−26.7) | 0.71 |
Impulsive/Compulsive Buying | 187 | −30.7 (−37.7,−25.2) | 14 | −32.4 (−42.3,−27.6) | 0.30 |
RYGB=Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass; SCID= Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; AUDIT=Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test.
These analyses had 80% power to detect a difference in % weight loss of 7–8%, i.e., the analysis was underpowered to detect a real difference smaller than this amount.