Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 1;65(2):154–160. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.65.154

Table 1.

Flowering and maturation time, seed weight and ingredient contents of DET and IND of RILs

RILs Location Year Growth habit No. of lines FT (day) MT (day) SW (g) PRO (%) OIL (%)
OA-RILs Akita 2009 P1: Ohsuzu 1 46 106 28.6 42.6 20.3
P2: Athow 1 41 114 27.6 40.6 21.5

IND 136 47 117 27.2 42.5 20.0
DET 80 49 116 25.7 42.3 19.8
** ns * ns ns

2010 P1: Ohsuzu 1 39 113 27.9 42.5 21.3
P2: Athow 1 35 114 22.8 40.2 22.6

IND 130 40 119 25.1 40.7 21.7
DET 78 42 120 23.0 40.6 21.8
** ns ** ns ns

Kyoto 2010 P1: Ohsuzu 1 32 106 51.2 44.6 20.2
P2: Athow 1 29 107 55.3 40.4 22.5

IND 26 32 114 48.5 43.7 21.1
DET 26 35 116 53.7 43.3 20.9
* ns * ns ns

ST-RILs Akita 2010 P1: Stressland 1 43 128 64.3 40.3 22.0
P2: Tachinagaha 1 50 140 52.8 42.0 20.6

IND 48 47 134 51.5 42.0 21.0
DET 42 48 134 44.3 42.4 21.0
ns ns ** ns ns

Kyoto 2010 P1: Stressland 1 33 118 45.0 42.2 21.5
P2: Tachinagaha 1 34 124 52.5 44.2 21.0

IND 32 34 125 45.9 43.6 21.2
DET 28 33 121 45.8 45.1 20.6
ns ns ns ** **

Overall IND 372 43 120 32.7 41.9 20.9
DET 254 43 121 33.0 42.2 20.8
ns ns ns ns ns

DET: determinate growth plants, IND: indeterminate growth plants, FT: flowering time, MT: maturation time, SW: seed weight per plant, PRO: protein content, OIL: oil content.

*, **, ***

significant between IND and DET at 5.0%, 1.0% and 0.1% levels, respectively (Student’s t-test).