Skip to main content
. 2015 May 13;10(5):e0125675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125675

Table 1. Comparison of key characteristics of pilot versus rollout facilities.

PILOT ROLLOUT
Facility Type/Code UHC1 UHC2 UHC3 RHC1 RHC2 DH1 RHC3 RHC4 RHC5
Province Lusaka Lusaka Western Western Western Southern Luapula Luapula Luapula
District Lusaka Lusaka Mongu Mongu Mongu Kalomo Mansa Mansa Mansa
General                  
Distance from DHO (KM) 9 10 2 18 76 2 89 42 10
Laboratory on-site Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No
Finger prick or Venepuncture Both FP VNP FP FP Both Both FP Both
RST testing days/week 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
Supervision                  
District Supervisory Visits 5 5 5 5 5
Program Supervisory Visits 20 20 3 3 3 1 1 1 1
Quality Assurance/Control                  
External Quality Control Weekly using pre-manufactured control samples Inconsistently conducted; only 1 clinic used own positive and negative samples
External Quality Assurance Twice during cost period using dried tube specimens In 1 district, proficiency testing attempted, but DTS results not returned to District Lab
Confirmatory Retesting Conducted on 10% of all RST samples   Not included in the national rollout 

DTS = Dry Tube Specimen; FP = Finger Prick; KM = Kilometre; RHC = Rural Health Centre; UHC = Urban Health Centre; VNP = Venepuncture