Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 30;2015:387382. doi: 10.1155/2015/387382

Table 1.

Relationship between the expression of GRO-β and clinicopathological characteristics in ovarian cancer.

Characteristic n Low or no expression High expression Pearson χ 2 P value
Total 136 61 75
Age 2.051 0.152
 ≤60 94 46 (48.94) 48 (51.06)
 >60 42 15 (35.71) 27 (64.29)
Histological type 1.176 0.555
 Serous 89 37 (41.57) 52 (58.43)
 Endometrioid 13 7 (53.85) 6 (46.15)
 Others 34 17 (50.00) 17 (50.00)
Differentiation 1.083 0.298
 Low 28 15 (53.57) 13 (46.43)
 High 108 46 (42.59) 62 (57.41)
FIGO stage 4.593 0.032
 I~II 80 42 (52.50) 38 (47.50)
 III~IV 56 19 (33.93) 37 (66.07)
CEA level 1.636 0.201
 ≤5 80 34 (42.50) 46 (57.50)
 >5 13 8 (61.54) 5 (38.46)
 Unknown 43 19 24
CA19-9 level 0.053 0.817
 ≤37 70 32 (45.71) 38 (54.29)
 >37 21 9 (42.86) 12 (57.14)
 Unknown 45 20 25
CA125 level 0.853 0.355
 ≤35 12 4 (33.33) 8 (66.67)
 >35 82 39 (47.56) 43 (52.44)
 Unknown 42 18 24
CA153 level 1.457 0.227
 ≤31 38 20 (52.63) 18 (47.37)
 >31 48 19 (39.58) 29 (60.42)
 Unknown 50 22 28
SF level 2.686 0.101
 ≤204 59 30 (50.85) 29 (49.15)
 >204 28 9 (32.14) 19 (67.86)
 Unknown 49 22 27
Ascites 4.916 0.027
 No 48 26 (54.17) 22 (45.83)
 Yes 42 13 (30.95) 29 (69.05)
 Unknown 46 22 24
Lymph node and other metastases 26.097 <0.001
 No 60 37 (61.67) 23 (38.33)
 Yes 76 24 (31.58) 52 (68.42)

P < 0.05.

Others: clear cell, nine cases; mucinous, seven cases; transitional cell, six cases; mixed, 12 cases.