Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 16;112(10):1617–1625. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.138

Table 3. Validation of the MBCSIM model in 108 ER-positive breast cancer patients for a follow-up period of 5 years.

  Validation database Simulation (mean±s.d.)
Initial imaging tests
  116 104.0±6.5
BS and X-bone 53 52.2±3.8
MRI bone 8 15.3±2.2
FDG-PET/CT 3 1.2±0.3
X-ray lung 31 16.9±0.8
CT lung/liver 7 2.0±0.4
Ultrasound liver 7 7.0±0.3
MRI liver 0 0.2±0.1
MRI brain 7 9.2±2.5
FES-PET/CT 0 0.0±0.0
Staging tests
  13 17.9±1.3
CT lung+CT liver 5 11.3±1.0
BS+CT lung+CT liver 8 6.6±0.9
Biopsy tests
  18 20.3±1.5
Bone 6 7.4±1.0
Lung 10 5.6±0.5
Liver 0 3.3±0.2
Brain 2 4.0±1.0
MBCs found
  14 10.2±1.0
Bone 8 3.7±0.6
Lung 3 2.7±0.3
Liver 2 2.6±0.2
Brain 1 1.2±0.3

Abbreviations: BS, bone scan; CT=computed tomography; ER=oestrogen receptor; FDG=2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose; FES=16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-oestradiol; MBC=metastatic breast cancer; MBCSIM, metastatic breast cancer simulation; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; PET=positron emission tomography.