Table 3. Coefficients of Full and Final Models, and Comparably Best Fitting Models, with Pairwise Comparisons for Levels of Each Fixed Effect in the Model.

Response Variable	Model	Fixed Effects	Estimate	SE	z Value	p	Sig. Codes
a) Calling (yes/no)	Location * Feeding order * Sex + Age class + Residency (Full model)	(Intercept)	−3.708	1.528	−2.427	0.0152	*
		Location (Bears vs. Wild boars)	−0.835	0.472	−1.769	0.0768	+
		Feeding order (First vs. Second)	−1.101	0.668	−1.647	0.0995	+
		Sex (Female vs. Male)	−3.870	2.258	−1.714	0.0865	+
		Age class (Adult vs. Juvenile)	6.361	3.901	1.631	0.1030
		Age class (Adult vs. Subadult)	−0.239	1.858	−0.129	0.8975
		Age class (Juvenile vs. Subadult)	−7.545	4.203	−1.795	0.0726	+
		Residency (Resident vs. Visitor)	0.196	1.862	0.105	0.9161
		Residency (Resident vs. Vagrant)	−1.056	2.405	−0.439	0.6608
		Residency (Visitor vs. Vagrant)	−1.676	2.432	−0.689	0.4906
		Location : Feeding order	0.611	0.816	0.749	0.4538
		Location : Sex	0.683	0.882	0.774	0.4392
		Feeding order : Sex	−17.467	3785.431	−0.005	0.9963
		Location : Feeding order : Sex	16.710	3785.431	0.004	0.9965
	Feeding order (Final model)	(Intercept)	−9.076	2.146	−4.230	<0.0001	***
		Feeding order (First vs. Second)	−1.121	0.310	−3.616	0.0003	***
	Location + Feeding order	(Intercept)	−8.919	2.149	−4.151	<0.0001	***
		Location (Bears vs. Wild boars)	−0.362	0.333	−1.085	0.2779
		Feeding order (First vs. Second)	−0.977	0.336	−2.910	0.0036	**
	Location + Feeding order + Sex	(Intercept)	−7.360	2.160	−3.408	0.0007	***
		Location (Bears vs. Wild boars)	−0.361	0.333	−1.084	0.2782
		Feeding order (First vs. Second)	−0.976	0.336	−2.907	0.0036	**
		Sex (Female vs. Male) (Intercept)	−2.104	4.150	−0.507	0.6121
	Location * Feeding order	(Intercept)	−8.854	2.157	−4.105	<0.0001	***
		Location (Bears vs. Wild boars)	−0.573	0.402	−1.426	0.1540
		Feeding order (First vs. Second)	−1.463	0.613	−2.388	0.0170	*
		Location * Feeding order	0.700	0.728	0.962	0.3360
	Feeding order + Sex	(Intercept)	−7.521	2.157	−3.486	0.0005	***
		Feeding order (First vs. Second)	−1.121	0.310	−3.614	0.0003	***
		Sex (Female vs. Male)	−2.100	4.155	−0.506	0.6132
b) Call rate	Calling frequency * Landing frequency (Full model)	(Intercept)	3.171	3.445	0.920	0.357
		Calling frequency	0.019	0.061	0.315	0.753
		Landing frequency	−0.016	0.046	−0.342	0.732
		Calling frequency : landing frequency	−0.0002	0.0008	−0.256	0.798
	Landing frequency (Final model)	(Intercept)	4.963	0.470	10.553	<0.0001	***
		Landing frequency (Intercept)	−0.036	0.006	−5.833	<0.0001	***
		(Intercept)	4.021	0.932	4.313	<0.0001	***
	Calling frequency + Landing frequency	Calling frequency	0.004	0.003	1.169	0.2426
		Landing frequency	−0.027	0.010	−2.677	0.0074	**
c) Call rate	Residency	(Intercept)	2.381	0.069	34.50	<0.0001	***
		Residency (Resident vs. Visitor)	−0.296	0.094	−3.152	0.0016	**
		Residency (Resident vs. Vagrant)	−0.621	0.182	−3.416	0.0006	***
		Residency (Visitor vs. Vagrant)	−0.325	0.181	−1.794	0.0728	+
	Focal Individual	Intercept	2.443	0.071	34.40	<0.0001	***
		Bi vs. Ge	−0.694	0.180	−3.853	0.0001	***
		Bi vs. Go	−0.438	0.206	−2.131	0.0331	*
		Bi vs. Hm	−0.495	0.165	−3.007	0.0026	**
		Bi vs. La	−0.550	0.133	−4.147	>0.0001	***
		Bi vs. Ti	−0.080	0.121	−0.658	0.5103
		Ge vs. Go	0.255	0.256	0.998	0.3181
		Ge vs. Hm	0.199	0.223	0.891	0.3731
		Ge vs. La	0.144	0.199	0.720	0.4713
		Ge vs. Ti	0.614	0.195	3.143	0.0017	**
		Go vs. Hm	−0.057	0.248	−0.288	0.8193
		Go vs. La	−0.112	0.226	−0.495	0.6203
		Go vs. Ti	0.359	0.218	1.646	0.0997	+
		Hm vs. La	−0.055	0.192	−0.289	0.0243	*
		Hm vs. Ti	0.495	0.165	3.007	0.0026	**
		La vs. Ti	0.415	0.184	2.252	0.0243	*

Note. (:) indicate interactions between fixed effects; (*) and (+) indicate significance levels

^***p < 0.001.

^**p < 0.01.

^*p < 0.05.

⁺p < 0.1