Table 1.
Outcome | Variable | Measure | Scale | Assessment points (v) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Use | Frequency of interventions’ use: | Scale items: | ||
Youth KIT's 9 sections and interactions with the online mentor | Youth KIT questionnaires* | Youth KIT: I read this section; I used this section once; I used this section more than once; I did not use this section; This section did not apply to me; Mentor: I used it once; | v2–4 | |
I used it more than once; I did not use it; it did not apply to me | ||||
Online activity | Login and chats with the mentor (through the host website) | Not applicable | Throughout the study | |
Utility | Interventions’ features: | Youth KIT questionnaires, including open-ended responses about likes and suggestions for improvement | 7-point Likert scale: 0=not applicable/did not use it; 1=not at all; 7=very great extent | v2–4 |
Youth KIT: organised, easy to use; easy to understand; relevant | ||||
Mentor: easy to use; easy to understand; relevant | ||||
Impact | Performance and satisfaction with transition goals | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure scoring system† | 10-point Likert scale: 1=lowest; 10=highest | v1–4 |
Interventions’ helpfulness in self-management areas | Youth KIT questionnaires, including open-ended responses | 7-point Likert scale: 0=not applicable/did not use it; 1=not at all; 7=very great extent | v2–4 | |
Impact on youth and healthcare providers | Semistructured interviews with youth and healthcare providers about the interventions | Post-transfer |
*Use, utility and impact questions for the Youth KIT (and the mentor's) were developed by the team using questionnaires from prior projects involving the Youth KIT.32
†The COPM is an individualised outcome measure designed to detect change in performance and satisfaction with performance in activities identified by the respondent as being important to him/her.33 For this study, we applied the COPM scoring system for performance and satisfaction.
COPM, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; v, visit.