Skip to main content
. 2015 May 14;59(6):3675–3682. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04381-14

TABLE 1.

Comparison of conidial versus fragmented-mycelium inoculum for CLSI method using a set of clinical isolates

Clinical strain AFAa nb Concn range (mg/liter) for method:
Conidiumc
Fragmented-mycelium inoculum prepn methodd
MIC MEC MIC MEC
Trichophyton mentagrophytes AMP 4 0.25–1.0 1.0
TER 4 0.03 0.03–0.06
FLC 4 16.0–32.0 16.0–32.0
POS 4 0.5–1.0 0.25–2.0
VRC 4 0.125–0.5 0.5
ITR 4 0.25–2.0 1.0
MCA 4 0.016 0.016–16.0
ANI 4 0.016–0.03 0.016–16.0
CAS 4 0.25–1.0 0.06–0.5
Trichophyton tonsurans AMP 3 0.06–0.5 0.25–1.0
TER 3 0.03 0.03
FLC 3 0.5–32.0 8.0–32.0
POS 3 0.5–1.0 0.25–0.5
VRC 3 0.06–0.5 0.03–0.25
ITR 3 0.125–1.0 0.125–2.0
MCA 3 0.016–0.125 0.016–0.03
ANI 3 0.016–0.03 0.016–0.03
CAS 3 0.25–2.0 0.06–1.0
Trichophyton rubrum AMP 7 0.125–0.5 0.5
TER 7 0.03 0.03
FLC 7 0.125–32.0 0.25–4.0
POS 7 0.06–1.0 0.06–0.5
VRC 7 0.03–2.0 0.03–0.06
ITR 7 0.06–1.0 0.06–1.0
MCA 7 0.016 0.016
ANI 7 0.016 0.016
CAS 7 0.125–1.0 0.5–1.0
Microsporum canis AMP 4 0.06–0.25 0.25
TER 4 0.06 0.03–0.06
FLC 4 4.0–16.0 2.0–32.0
POS 4 1.0 0.5
VRC 4 0.06–0.125 0.03–0.125
ITR 4 0.25–1.0 0.125–1.0
MCA 4 0.016 0.016
ANI 4 0.016 0.016
CAS 4 0.25–0.5 0.125–0.5
a

Tested antifungal agents (AFAs): amphotericin B (AMP), terbinafine (TER), fluconazole (FLC), posaconazole (POS), voriconazole (VRC), itraconazole (ITR), micafungin (MCA), anidulafungin (ANI), and caspofungin (CAS).

b

Number of isolates; each isolate was tested once.

c

Microdilution testing according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method (6) using conidia for inoculum preparation.

d

Microdilution testing according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method using fragmented mycelium for inoculum preparation.