Skip to main content
. 2015 May 15;9:37. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00037

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

There was no significant difference in lick patterning when licking water. (A) Representative lickometer traces for WT (top) and KO (bottom) mice. Lick duration (B), ILI (C), and duty cycle (D) are similar between WT and KO mice when licking for water (p > 0.05). (E) Power spectral density of licking. Points represent data from individual mice. Lines represent mean and SEM.